How We Score

Council evaluates every idea across 5 dimensions, applies penalties for structural risks, and assigns a verdict. Here's exactly how.

The 5 Dimensions

Each scored 0-20, summed to form the base score (0-100)

Team

0-20 points

16-20
Exceptional

Perfect founder-market fit, deep domain expertise, complementary skills, prior exits

11-15
Good

Good relevant experience, some gaps but manageable

6-10
Limited

Limited domain experience OR missing critical skills

0-5
Weak

No relevant experience, solo with no plan to hire gaps

Market

0-20 points

16-20
Exceptional

Large proven market, clear buyer, validated willingness to pay

11-15
Good

Growing market, identified buyer, payment intent plausible

6-10
Limited

Uncertain market size, unclear buyer, unvalidated payment

0-5
Weak

Tiny/shrinking market, no clear buyer

Traction

0-20 points

16-20
Exceptional

Revenue with strong retention, multiple paying customers, $10K+ MRR

11-15
Good

Users/pilots with engagement, early revenue, significant free usage

6-10
Limited

Prototype/demo only, no real users

0-5
Weak

Just an idea, nothing built

Defensibility

0-20 points

16-20
Exceptional

Strong moat — network effects, data flywheel, patents, high switching costs

11-15
Good

Emerging moat, plausible path to defensibility

6-10
Limited

Weak moat, easy to replicate, no evidence of stickiness

0-5
Weak

No moat, commodity play

Timing

0-20 points

16-20
Exceptional

Clear market inflection point, regulatory tailwind, technology unlock

11-15
Good

Good timing, growing trend, some tailwinds

6-10
Limited

Neutral timing, no clear catalyst, no visible momentum

0-5
Weak

Bad timing, headwinds, too early or too late

Base Score

baseScore = Team + Market + Traction + Defensibility + Timing

Range: 0-100

Penalty System

Binary structural checks. Each applied penalty deducts 10 points.

-10 pts

Capital Insufficient

The stated budget covers less than 6 months of estimated burn rate.

Does not apply if founder has demonstrated real traction (paying users, active beta, or MRR).

-10 pts

Founder-Market Mismatch

The founding team lacks critical domain expertise for this specific market.

General tech background does not count for regulated industries (healthcare, finance, legal).

-10 pts

No Distribution

No clear path to first 100 customers. No existing audience, no channel partnerships, no organic strategy.

"We'll do marketing" is not a distribution strategy.

Council Score

councilScore = max(0, baseScore - appliedPenalties × 10)

Verdict Decision Tree

The default verdict is risky. The model must prove a higher verdict is warranted.

STRONG

  • councilScore ≥ 75
  • No penalties
  • Traction ≥ 14
  • Team ≥ 14
  • Defensibility ≥ 11

Reserved for exceptional ideas with proven traction.

PROMISING

  • councilScore 60-79
  • No penalties
  • Traction > 5
  • Team > 8

Solid foundation with clear potential.

RISKY

  • Default verdict
  • Everything else that doesn't qualify for weak

Needs more work before committing resources.

WEAK

  • councilScore < 40
  • OR 3 penalties applied
  • OR any dimension scored 0-1

Fundamental issues that must be resolved first.